PERITONITIS PROFILE IN SAIFUL ANWAR GENERAL HOSPITAL MALANG ON 2016-2017

Andreas Rendra, Aries Budianto

Abstract


Introduction: Peritonitis is the most common abdominal emergency in emergency departments throughout the world. The cause of peritonitis testing is perforation with high mortality and morbidity rates.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the description of peritonitis cases in RSSA Malang on January 2016- December 2017.

Material and Methods: The study design is a descriptive study with a sample of all peritonitis patients treated at RSSA Malang on January 2016-December 2017 that met the inclusion criteria, patients undergoing completion therapy. The medical sample was collected such as sex, age, cause of peritonitis, surgery, duration of treatment, and the condition of the patient's discharge.

Results: The number of peritonitis patients in RSSA Malang on January 2016-December 2017 was 31 who fulfilled the inclusion criteria of 303 patients. Peritonitis prevalence in men (65.3%) is higher than in women (34.7%). The largest age group is 20-29 years (20.5%). The most common cause of peritonitis is due to appendix perforation (48.8%). Most peritonitis patients received surgical management in the form of exploratory laparatomy and appendectomy (43.5%). The length of stay was 4-7 days (41.9%). According to the conditions of the exit most of them were alive (76.8%).

Conclusion: Peritonitis patients who were treated at RSSA Malang on January 2016- December 2017 were predominantly male, with age distributions ranging from 20-29 years. The most common cause of peritonitis is peritonitis due to appendix perforation. Laparatomy exportation and appendectomy are the most common surgical procedures performed at RSSA Malang. The mortality rate is still quite high at 23%.

Keywords


Peritonitis, Exploratory laparatomy, Appendectomy, Mortality rate

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agarwal, A, Choudhary, GA, Bairwa M., Choudhary A. Apache II scoring in predicting surgical outcome in patients of perforation peritonitis. International Surgery Journal. 2017 July;4(7).

Skipworth, R.J.E, Fearon K.C.H. Acute abdomen: peritonitis. Surgery Journal. 2008 March; 26(7): 98-101

Samuel JC, Qureshi JS, Mulima G, Shores CG, Cairins BA, Charles AG.An observational study of etiology, clinical presentation, and outcomes associated with peritonitis in ilonge, Malawi. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2011: 6-38

World Health Organization. Typhoid fever, Democratic Republic of the Kongo. Weekly Epidemiological Record. 2005;1 (80):1-8

Daley BJ. Peritonitis and abdominal sepsis. Medscape. Dis [serial online] 2017 (diunduh 10 Januari 2018). Tersedia dari URL : HYPERLINK https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/180234-overview#a6

Depkes RI. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia. Jakarta : Depkes RI. 2008

Ordonez, CA, Puyama, C.J. Management of peritonitis in the critically III patient. NIH public access. 2006 December; 86 (6):1323-1349

Evans, HL. Tertiary peritonitis (recurrent diffuse or localized disease) is not an independent predictor of mortality in surgical patients with intraabdominal infection. Surgical infection. 2001.: 2 (4): 255-63

Iwagaki, H. Clinical value cytokine antagonist in infectious complication res communmol pathol pharmacol. 1997 April: 96(1): 25-34

Marshall, JC. Intensive care management of intraabdominal infection. Critical care medicine. 2003; 31(8); 2228-37

Fauci et al. Harrison's Principal Of Internal Medicine McGraw Hill, Peritonitis. 2008; pages 808-810, 1916-1917.

Dusan, J, Zlatibor, L, Kristina, D, Aleksandar, K. Intra-abdominal infection and acute abdomen-epidemiology, diagnosis, and general principles of surgical management. 2015: 10 (1): 69-78

Mustafa, M, Menon, J, Muniandy, RK, Sieman, J, Shafira, AM, Illzam, EM. Pathophysiology, clinical manifestation, and diagnosis of peritonitis. IOSR Journal of dental and medical sciences. 2015 October; 14 (10).

Schwartz, S.I et al, Principal of Surgery, 9th edition USA: McGraw Hill Company., 2006; Hal1459-1467

Doherty, G.M., Current Diagnosis & Treatment. USA: McGraw Hill Company. 2010

Rachmahandra, ML. Age, sex incidence with signs, and symptoms of peritonitis. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2014 August : 2(3);916-919

Bali, R.S Verma, S, Agarwal, P.W, Singh, R, Talwar, N. Clinical study: Perforation peritonitis and the developing world. ISRN Surgery.2014

Mabewa, A, Seni, J.L, Chaya, P, Mshra, S, Gilyma, J.M. Etiology, treatment outcome, and prognostic factors among patients with secondary peritonitis at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza Tanzania. World Journal of Emergency. 2015

Singh, A, Khan I.H, Singh, S.P. Study of spectrum of perforation and it's management: A cross-sectional study at a tertiary care institute. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences. 2017: 5 (2B); 379-384

Mewara, B.C, Chorashiya, B.K, Porwal, S, Porwal, V, Gupta, A. A clinical study if spectrum of gastrointestinal perforation peritonitis in rural southern east Rajasthan. Journal of universal surgery. 2017:5; 2-9

Ayandipo, O.O, afuwapel, O.O, Irabor, D.O, Abdurrazzaq, A.L, Nwafulume, N.A. Outcome of laparatomy for peritonitis in 302 consecutive patients in Ibadan Nigeria. 2016 : 14: 30-34.

Oheneh M. Postoperative complication after surgery for typhoid ileal perforation in adults in Kumasi. Western African Journal of medicine. 2007: 28 (1); 32-38

Sotto, A, Lefrant JY, Peray PF, Muller, L, Tafuri J, Navarro F, et al. Evaluation of antimicrobial therapy management of 120 consecutive patients with secondary peritonitis. Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2002;50:569-76

Cavallaro A, Catania V, cavallaro M, Zanghi A, Cappelani A. Management of secondary peritonitis. Ann Ital Chir. 2008; 79: 255-60

Sahu S, Gupta A, Sachran P. Bahl D. Outcome of secondary peritonitis based on Apache II score. The Internet Journal Surgery. 2007;14(2).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.